Talia Gibson vs En Shuo Liang Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Sep at 06:07 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Gibson vs E. Shuo Liang

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

TPE
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Gibson 1 - 0 Liang
They have played 3 sets in total, with Talia Gibson winning 2 and En Shuo Liang winning 1. The last match between Talia Gibson and En Shuo Liang was at the Jingshan Tennis Open - Jingshan, 26-09-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Talia Gibson getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gibson | 1 |
| Liang | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Jingshan Tennis Open - Jingshan(09-26-25)
T. Gibson vs E. S. Liang H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $406,160 | Career Prize Money | $265,799 |
| 63.12% (178-104) | Career Total W/L | 53.16% (202-178) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 10 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 25.00% (2-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Gibson vs E. S. Liang Match Preview:
- How do the players compare in terms of recent second serve performance? En Shuo Liang has slightly lower success at 40.19% compared to Talia Gibson's 41.95%.
- In terms of return games, En Shuo Liang excels in capturing 51.34% of opponent's second serve points, while Talia Gibson manages 48.79%.
- Analyzing first serve returns, En Shuo Liang has an edge with 32.27% over Talia Gibson's 31.89%.
- Considering pressure situations, En Shuo Liang saves 53.51% of breakpoints, higher than Talia Gibson's 50.00%.
- Looking at yearly performance, En Shuo Liang wins 56.00% of her matches, whereas Talia Gibson leads with 65.33%.
- What is each player's best surface? En Shuo Liang performs best on Grass with a 55% win rate, while Talia Gibson excels on Hard with 67%.
- Analyzing last year's tournament levels, En Shuo Liang has a 59.09% win rate in Challengers/ITF events, whereas Talia Gibson boasts 71.43%.
- In terms of opponent quality, En Shuo Liang faces players with an average rank of 312.74, compared to Talia Gibson's tougher opponents ranked at 175.15.
- When matches proceed to a deciding set, Talia Gibson has a higher success rate of 62% as opposed to En Shuo Liang's 47%.
Editorial Prediction (September 26, 2025, UTC):
In evaluating the players' recent performances, Talia Gibson shows a slight advantage in various critical areas. She has a marginally better second serve performance and performs well in pressure situations.
En Shuo Liang's ability to return opponent's serves effectively gives her an edge, yet Talia Gibson has shown a tendency to handle tougher opponents and perform better in deciding sets.
Given Talia Gibson's superior match-winning percentage and her proficiency on Hard courts, where the current event is likely to be, she appears to have an upper hand.
Based on the analysis, Talia Gibson is predicted to be the likely winner of this upcoming tennis match.
Talia Gibson vs En Shuo Liang Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Gibson vs E. S. Liang H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 10 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:17:33 | Average Match Time | 2:17:33 |
| 63% (54/86) | 1st Serve % | 57% (60/105) |
| 48% (26/54) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (32/60) |
| 63% (20/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (18/45) |
| 35% (8/23) | Break Pts Won % | 56% (5/9) |
| 52% (55/105) | Return Points Win % | 47% (40/86) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Gibson Recent Matches Played
E. S. Liang Recent Matches Played

T. Gibson vs E. S. Liang Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.12% (178/104) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.16% (202/178) |
| 61.52% (406/254) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.41% (470/410) |
| 54.40% (3333/2794) | Games Win/Loss | 51.89% (4183/3878) |
| 65.61% (145/76) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.09% (146/119) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 40.82% (20/29) |
| 60.00% (18/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54.35% (25/21) |
| 50.00% (12/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 55.00% (11/9) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 919 | Aces Total | 786 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 956 | Total Double Faults | 1152 |
| 1:37:18 | Average Match Time | 1:30:28 |
| 407.82 | Average Opponent Rank | 437.95 |
| 64% (12205/18973) | 1st Serve % | 59% (14739/24830) |
| 66% (8037/12205) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (9391/14739) |
| 48% (3220/6767) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (4814/10091) |
| 46% (1067/2339) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1366/2968) |
| 45% (8671/19327) | Return Points Win % | 44% (10974/24687) |
| 50.00% (10/10) | Slam W/L | 42.11% (8/11) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 66.67% (6/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 42.86% (3/4) |
| 38.89% (7/11) | Main Tour W/L | 46.81% (22/25) |
| 63.72% (137/78) | Challenger W/L | 53.82% (148/127) |
| 85.71% (24/4) | Futures W/L | 65.22% (15/8) |
| 63% (176/280) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (200/371) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 61% (45/74) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (45/87) |
| 47% (44/94) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (59/125) |
| 86% (180/154) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (196/166) |
| 14% (180/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (196/30) |
| 24% (102/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (184/36) |